![]() |
  | ![]() |
Figure 50. |   | Figure 51. |
Ichnology. This facies displays more intense bioturbation than facies K, ranging from 3 to 5. The assemblage includes Planolites montanus, Chondrites isp. (figs. 51-52), Rhizocorallium isp. (fig. 50), Diplocraterion isp. (figs. 50, 52), Teichichnus isp., Zoophycos isp., Cylindrichnus concentricus, Asterosoma isp., Palaeophycus isp., Ophiomorpha irregulaire, Skolithos isp., and Arenicolites isp. (fig. 51). Although some dwelling traces of suspension-feeders are present, the assemblage is dominated by feeding structures of deposit feeders. The association is an example of the Cruziana ichnofacies. The high density of trace fossils obliterates all evidence of primary bedding and physical sedimentary structures in most beds. Individual beds typically host several ichnotaxa. As a result of high bioturbation, individual forms are sometimes difficult to recognize. At Gaskill, a mottled indistinctive Palaeophycus and Planolites background ichnofabric is overprinted by discrete vertical U-shaped, medium-tiered Diplocraterion, which in turn are crosscut by very well defined specimens of deeper-tiered Rhizocorallium. At Nell, the tiering structure seems to be slightly different. Rhizocorallium is not very distinctive and Chondrites commonly occurs forming small clusters of up to 20 individuals in mudstone pockets or reworking other burrows, such as U-shaped Arenicolites, suggesting emplacement in a deep tier.
![]() |
Figure 52. |
Interpretation. Facies L is interpreted as a distal lower-shoreface deposit. The occasional presence of starved wave ripples indicates sporadic distal storm events. However, most evidence of physical sedimentation has been obliterated by bioturbation. Homogenization of event deposits by burrowing activity is a very common phenomenon in shoreface environments (e.g., Dott, 1988; Pemberton, MacEachern et al., 1992; Pemberton and MacEachern, 1997). Nevertheless, the nature of the ripples and the intensity of bioturbation suggest that sand was deposited in relatively thin beds. The conodont fauna is suggestive of nearshore settings (cf. Boardman et al., 1995). Trace-fossil assemblages from this facies resemble other lower-shoreface, fairweather ichnofaunas described from the Cretaceous of Canada (e.g., MacEachern et al., 1992; MacEachern and Pemberton, 1992). This facies is partially equivalent to facies 4 (interlaminated to bioturbated sandstone and shale) of Wheeler et al. (1990).
![]() |
Figure 53. |
Ichnology. The degree of bioturbation in facies M is highly variable. Interbedded coarse-grained beds are essentially unbioturbated, but finer-grained tops may exhibit low to moderate bioturbation (2 to 3). Conversely, the degree of bioturbation in very fine grained silty sandstones and siltstones is high (5). Trace-fossil assemblages include Planolites montanus (fig. 53), Chondrites isp. (fig. 53), Teichichnus isp., and Palaeophycus isp. Palaeophycus tends to occur in the finer-grained sandy tops, while the other forms are more abundant in the siltstone and silty sandstone intervals. The association is dominated by feeding traces of deposit-feeders and represents an example of the Cruziana ichnofacies.
Interpretation. This facies is interpreted as having been deposited in the transition zone between the offshore and the shoreface. Sedimentologic and ichnologic analyses reveal the interplay of storm-event deposition and background fairweather sedimentation. The erosional and depositional history of this facies can be summarized in four stages: (1) the initial erosive phase of the storm event recorded by the basal scoured surface, (2) the phase of main storm deposition represented by the coarse-grained, normally graded division, (3) the phase of waning storm deposition recorded by the wave rippled, finer-grained sandstone formed under lower-energy oscillatory conditions, and (4) the post-storm, fair-weather deposition phase characterized by the presence of interbedded, very fine grained silty sandstones and siltstones, which may record the latest stage of sediment fallout after the storm or background sedimentation (see also Pemberton, Van Wagoner et al., 1992; Pemberton and MacEachern, 1997). Biogenic activity was restricted to the third and fourth phases. Palaeophycus represents opportunistic colonization immediately after waning storm deposition, while feeding structures of deposit-feeders were emplaced after the storm and record the activity of the resident fairweather assemblage. Bioturbation by this later suite obliterated the upper contact, leading to the formation of diffuse gradational tops. This facies is a partial equivalent of facies 4 (interlaminated to bioturbated sandstone and shale) of Wheeler et al. (1990).
![]() |
  | ![]() |
Figure 54. |   | Figure 55. |
Ichnology. Degree of bioturbation is extremely high, ranging from 5 to 6. Tiny Phycosiphon incertum and Chondrites isp. represent the background ichnofabric. This assemblage is overprinted by relatively large and slightly compressed Thalassinoides isp. (fig. 54). The assemblage records the activity of a stable deposit-feeder community and may be regarded as an example of a depauperate Cruziana ichnofacies.
Interpretation. This facies is interpreted as representing offshore deposits. Deposition was dominated by sediment fallout of silt particles. Intense bioturbation resulted in complete to nearly complete obliteration of the original fabric. The dominance of feeding structures of deposit-feeders indicates a low-energy, nutrient-rich environment. Martin and Pollard (1996) have documented similar low-diversity Phycosiphon and Chondrites ichnofabrics from offshore deposits of the Fulmar Formation. The low diversity and small size of the burrows are suggestive of stressful environmental conditions, with low-oxygen content being the most likely candidate (cf. Savrda and Bottjer, 1986; Savrda, 1992). The facies-N ichnoassemblage seems to be represented by forms more or less typical of relatively deep tiers. In oxygen-depleted settings, uppermost tiers are replaced by deeper tiers (Bromley and Ekdale, 1984). However, Bromley (1996) urged caution in invoking a low-oxygen content when deeper-tier forms are responsible for total bioturbation. Extensive burrowing activity may have actually lead to the destruction of the shallower traces. This facies is a partial equivalent of facies 4 (interlaminated to bioturbated sandstone and shale) of Wheeler et al. (1990).
![]() |
Figure 56. |
Ichnology. No trace fossils have been recorded.
Interpretation. This facies is interpreted as having been deposited in a shelf environment. Sediment fallout of fine-grained particles was the dominant depositional process. Interbedded coarse-grained beds may record transgressive ravinement. Preservation of thin laminations, absence of bioturbation, and dark colors are suggestive of anoxic bottom-water conditions. The conodont fauna represents the Idiognathodus-Streptognathodus biofacies, most likely the Idiognathodus subfacies of Boardman et al. (1995). According to these authors, this subfacies characterizes deposition in oxygen-depleted, open-marine areas. Facies O is an equivalent of facies 1 (dark-gray, thinly laminated shale) of Wheeler et al. (1990).
Kansas Geological Survey
Web version November 9,1999
http://www.kgs.ku.edu/Current/1999/buatois/buatois9.html
email:lbrosius@kgs.ku.edu